Safe Money and the Plain Truth

Why the financial services industry is stacked against the American Retiree

Do You Have a Living Will??

leave a comment »

One of my friends and I were talking about this very issue just a few days ago.  You know I think a fair number of folks have thought about this very issue but for most people they’ve just never done it for one reason or another. 

Recently I located a free resource where you can print out a blank living will specific to the laws of your state.  All you have to do is fill it out and have a couple folks witness the document…that’s it!!  What makes it even better is that you can specify all sorts of things for your family about your wishes, such as, what kind of music you would like to have played at your funeral service, who you’d like to be your pallbearers etc.  The sorts of things that make life easier for your loved ones if you can’t communicate with them because your incapacitated or dead. 

I know these are not things that any of us like to think about but if you love your family take some time, print the document and fill it out!!  One more thing, never put your living will in a safe deposit box…when it’s needed you may not be able to go to the bank to get it and nobody else will be able to either!! So, put it in a safe place and let those you love know where to find it in case they need it.

Here’s the link to get the free living will. 

If you’re one of our friends or clients we will also save an electronic copy after you’ve filled it out and give you your own secure, private access to our server.  That way anyone you share your information with can access your living will from anywhere at any time it’s needed.

Advertisements

Written by brantleyw

September 20, 2009 at 9:34 am

Posted in Living Wills

Tagged with

“Cash For Clunkers”—A great success…Gimme A Break!!

leave a comment »

This week, Congressman Gary Peters from Michigan, called the “Cash for Clunkers” program “…great economic stimulus” and “it created immediate jobs.”  He went on to say, “The whole idea of ‘cash for clunkers’ was to act as priming the pump and get people back into showrooms. It was very successful at that."  Well you know what I say…gimme a break!!

I added up all of the money that the government has given to GM and Chrysler….$125 Billion.  And just this week, congressman Peters sponsored HR 3246 which will provide another $2.9 billion to the auto industry to research “alternative energy vehicles”.  The faucet in Washington just keeps running!! 

As I was reading about this situation earlier today I saw a comment from someone only identified as Bobby P. that said, “This is a temporary fix, and those given jobs will lose them again. What a colossal waste of money! This is not a stimulus plan; this is a giveaway of tax dollars. How stupid do they (legislators) think we are? A stimulus plan should not be called such until one invests capital to improve processes or a creating a manufacturing base of which we have little.”  Couldn’t say it any better myself…thanks Bobby P.

Of course I don’t have a crystal ball, but my guess is that taxpayers will never see any return on the money given to the automakers.  All of these programs like “Cash for Clunkers”, the real estate tax credit, and the free money we’ve given banks is nothing more than a temporary prop.  Politicians claiming victory have only created an artificial environment to operate.  Think about it….these clowns won’t show a profit for years…how could they when they’re:

1. Operating on taxpayer monies.

2. Advertising with taxpayer monies.

3. Giving incentives with taxpayer monies.

4. Paying Union Wages and Corporate Salaries with taxpayer monies.

Under these circumstances I think we could all run a profitable business.  Congressman Peters needs to lay off the Kool-Aid they’re serving on capitol hill.

Written by brantleyw

September 18, 2009 at 10:35 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

This should be posted in all schools and work places.

leave a comment »

Love  him or hate him, he sure hits the nail on the head with this! Bill Gates recently gave a speech at a  High School about 11 things they did not and will not learn in  school. He talks about how feel-good,  politically correct teachings created a generation of kids with  no concept of reality and how this concept set them up for failure  in the real worldclip_image002

Rule 1: Life is  not fair – get used to it!

Rule 2 : The world  won’t care about your self-esteem. The world will expect you to  accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself.  

Rule 3 : You will NOT make $60,000 a year right out of  high school. You won’t be a vice-president with a car phone until  you earn both.

Rule 4 : If you  think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss.

Rule 5 : Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your  Grandparents had a different word for burger flipping: they called  it opportunity.

Rule 6: If you  mess up, it’s not your parents’ fault, so don’t whine about  your mistakes, learn from them.

Rule 7: Before you  were born, your parents weren’t as boring as they are now. They got  that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes and listening  to you talk about how cool you thought you were. So before you save  the rain forest from the parasites of your parent’s generation, try  de-lousing the closet in your own room.

Rule 8:  Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life HAS  NOT. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades and they’ll  give you as MANY TIMES as you want to get the right answer. This  doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life.  

Rule 9: Life is not divided into semesters. You don’t  get summers off and very few employers are interested in helping you  FIND YOURSELF. Do that on your own time.

Rule 10:  Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to  leave the coffee shop and go to jobs.

Rule 11: Be nice  to nerds. Chances are you’ll end up working for one

Written by brantleyw

September 18, 2009 at 7:32 am

Posted in Uncategorized

The New Math of Social Security

leave a comment »

This was a recent article that was published by Smartmoney.com.  Definitely worth a read if you are on Medicare.   

COME JANUARY 2010, seniors may do a double take after seeing their Social Security checks. The two to three percentage-point increase in benefits they usually get each year won’t be there.

That’s because, for the first time in three decades, there likely won’t be a cost of living adjustment (COLA). “People notice when their checks don’t change, says Bruce Meyer, a professor at the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy.

In the context of degraded home prices and investment losses, the change will feel like a loss to many seniors, even though benefit amounts for 2010 won’t shrink. Social Security benefits are adjusted every year to keep up with inflation, so that seniors can retain their purchasing power. Adjustments are based on the consumer price index for urban wage earners (CPI-W) between the third quarter (July-September) of the previous year and the third quarter of the current year. The 2010 COLA will be based on a period marked by sharp drops in prices and deflation.

Democratic lawmakers are trying to lessen the perceived pain. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D., N.Y.) introduced legislation last week that would provide a one-time $150 payment for Social Security beneficiaries to compensate for the lack of an adjustment.
Still, anxious seniors should keep in mind that they will actually come out ahead of inflation. “In a sense, older people are going to do fine because the cost of living is down and they’re not going to have their benefits cut,” says John Laitner, the director of the Retirement Research Center at the University of Michigan.

Here is the good and bad about a flat COLA.

Reasons to Fret

Next COLA increase will be in 2012: Not only won’t seniors receive an adjustment for 2010, but the Social Security and Medicare Trustees project no cost of living adjustment for 2011 and only a modest 1.4% increase in 2012. That means seniors won’t see higher payments until 2012. Of course, the Trustees report is a forecast, and next year’s report, which will take into account new data, could be revised.

Rising health-care costs: Older people get hit more by rising health-care costs than younger people do, says Pamela Herd, an associate professor of public affairs and sociology at the University of Wisconsin. That’s because seniors are disproportionate users of the health-care system and pay about 20% higher out-of-pocket health care costs than does the rest of the population. So while inflation hasn’t really been a concern, health-care costs are increasingly eating into seniors’ Social Security checks.

Higher Medicare premiums for some: Medicare Part B premiums have increased almost every year to keep pace with the growth in Part B expenditures. (Part B insurance helps pay for some services not covered by Part A, generally on an outpatient basis.)

For most of the 42 million Part B beneficiaries, the amount of the monthly Social Security COLA each year has been more than enough to offset the increase in the Part B premium – resulting in net increases in benefits, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. But next year and in 2011, about 8% of Part B beneficiaries will be subject to higher premiums, sums that will be deducted from their Social Security payments. According to Kaiser, they’ll pay $104.20 a month in 2010 and $120.20 in 2011, up from $96.40 this year.

On the Upside

The benefit bump: Social Security beneficiaries got an atypically large 5.8% increase in benefits in 2009 – the biggest in more than 25 years. That outsize increase was primarily because of 2008’s spike in oil prices, says Laitner. But since then the CPI increase was lost as energy prices fell. It was an excessively high COLA that raised the purchasing power of seniors’ benefits, actually putting them “ahead where they should be,” says Andrew Biggs, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a nonprofit public policy group.

Seniors are better off than most: While the poverty rate increased from 2007 to 2008 and median household income fell, both indicators remained statistically unchanged for people 65 and older, according to last week’s Census report. “So the official data say that group is doing quite well – and all those numbers predated the 5.8% increase in Social Security benefits” this year, says Meyer of the University of Chicago.

Written by brantleyw

September 16, 2009 at 6:13 pm